| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 237 | |
| 5. |  | RIET-CORREA, F.; MIRABALLES, C. Cinco años de la Plataforma de Salud Animal. Producción Animal. Revista INIA Uruguay, 2020, no. 61, p. 32-36. (Revista INIA; 61). Los resultados de las actividades de la PSA son descriptos, en detalle, en los cinco informes anuales elaborados durante el período y elevados oportunamente al Comité Gerencial y la Junta Directiva.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| 16. | | CAFFARENA, D.; RIET-CORREA, F.; GIANNITTI, F. Uso de protocolos de manejo del dolor durante el desbotonamiento y descorne de las terneras de tambo: ¿Qué tan común es en Uruguay y Argentina?. In: Jornadas Uruguayas de Buiatría, 45., 2017, Paysandú, Uy., Matto, C.; Delpiazzo, R.(Ed.). Trabajos presentados. Paysandú: Centro Médico Veterinario de Paysandú/Sociedad Uruguaya de Buiatría, 2017. p.212-214.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 19. | | SARAVIA, A.; MIRABALLES, C.; RIET-CORREA, F.; CASTRO-JANER, E. Eimeria spp. in dairy calves in Uruguay. Identification, dynamics of oocyst excretion and association with the age of calves. Veterinary Parasitology: Regional Studies and Reports, 25 July 2021, Volume 25, Article number 100588. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2021.100588. Article history: Received 12 February 2020, Revised 19 February 2021, Accepted 12 May 2021, Available online 14 May 2021.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
|  |
| 20. | | SCHILD, C.; CAFFARENA, D.; RIET-CORREA, F.; GIANNITTI, F. Enfermedad articular degenerativa de las rodillas en una vaca. In: JORNADAS URUGUAYAS DE BUIATRÍA, 43., 2015, PAYSANDÚ, UY.; GIANNEECHINI, E.; MATTO, C. (Ed.). [Trabajos presentados]. Paysandú: Centro Médico Veterinario de Paysandú/Sociedad Uruguaya de Buiatría. p.221-223.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 237 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
27/08/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
25/02/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
MIRABALLES, C.; RIET-CORREA, F. |
|
Afiliación : |
MÓNICA MIRABALLES FERRER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FRANKLIN RIET-CORREA AMARAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
A review of the history of research and control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Experimental and Applied Acarology, 2018, v. 75, no. 4, p. 383-398. |
|
DOI : |
10.1007/s10493-018-0278-3 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 13 May 2018 / Accepted: 30 July 2018. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract: In Uruguay, control of Rhipicephalus microplus began in 1910. In 1941 the eradication of R. micoplus throughout the country was declared mandatory, although this attempt was unsuccessful. Since 2008 the country was divided into two regions: the south-western region, which is free of ticks; and a region of tick control that includes all departments to the north of the Rio Negro and five departments in the eastern region. In Uruguay, investigations on R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis started in 1921, and in the 1970s, studies of the epidemiology of R. microplus determined that from 2 to 3.5 generations can be produced annually and that the country is in an area of enzootic instability for babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Knowledge of tick epidemiology and of tick resistance to different acaricides led to the development of efficient methods of control or eradication, including integrated control and generational treatment. Although research results have led to a legal framework regarding R. microplus control, these measures have had variable results. This can be attributed to several factors, such as the discontinuation of the control measures,
variable financial resources, changes in the dynamics of livestock movement, failure to adopt available technology for tick control by farmers, climate change, environmental alterations such as forestation and the increasing resistance of ticks to acaricides, which led to the development of multiresistant ticks. This paper reviews the history of R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay and proposes alternatives for their control. MenosAbstract: In Uruguay, control of Rhipicephalus microplus began in 1910. In 1941 the eradication of R. micoplus throughout the country was declared mandatory, although this attempt was unsuccessful. Since 2008 the country was divided into two regions: the south-western region, which is free of ticks; and a region of tick control that includes all departments to the north of the Rio Negro and five departments in the eastern region. In Uruguay, investigations on R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis started in 1921, and in the 1970s, studies of the epidemiology of R. microplus determined that from 2 to 3.5 generations can be produced annually and that the country is in an area of enzootic instability for babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Knowledge of tick epidemiology and of tick resistance to different acaricides led to the development of efficient methods of control or eradication, including integrated control and generational treatment. Although research results have led to a legal framework regarding R. microplus control, these measures have had variable results. This can be attributed to several factors, such as the discontinuation of the control measures,
variable financial resources, changes in the dynamics of livestock movement, failure to adopt available technology for tick control by farmers, climate change, environmental alterations such as forestation and the increasing resistance of ticks to acaricides, which led to the development of multiresistant ticks. This pape... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ANAPLAMOSIS; BABESIOSIS; CATTLE TICK; CONTROL. |
|
Thesagro : |
URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L73 Enfermedades de los animales |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02354naa a2200217 a 4500
001 1058946
005 2019-02-25
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1007/s10493-018-0278-3$2DOI
100 1 $aMIRABALLES, C.
245 $aA review of the history of research and control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
500 $aArticle history: Received: 13 May 2018 / Accepted: 30 July 2018.
520 $aAbstract: In Uruguay, control of Rhipicephalus microplus began in 1910. In 1941 the eradication of R. micoplus throughout the country was declared mandatory, although this attempt was unsuccessful. Since 2008 the country was divided into two regions: the south-western region, which is free of ticks; and a region of tick control that includes all departments to the north of the Rio Negro and five departments in the eastern region. In Uruguay, investigations on R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis started in 1921, and in the 1970s, studies of the epidemiology of R. microplus determined that from 2 to 3.5 generations can be produced annually and that the country is in an area of enzootic instability for babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Knowledge of tick epidemiology and of tick resistance to different acaricides led to the development of efficient methods of control or eradication, including integrated control and generational treatment. Although research results have led to a legal framework regarding R. microplus control, these measures have had variable results. This can be attributed to several factors, such as the discontinuation of the control measures, variable financial resources, changes in the dynamics of livestock movement, failure to adopt available technology for tick control by farmers, climate change, environmental alterations such as forestation and the increasing resistance of ticks to acaricides, which led to the development of multiresistant ticks. This paper reviews the history of R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay and proposes alternatives for their control.
650 $aURUGUAY
653 $aANAPLAMOSIS
653 $aBABESIOSIS
653 $aCATTLE TICK
653 $aCONTROL
700 1 $aRIET-CORREA, F.
773 $tExperimental and Applied Acarology, 2018$gv. 75, no. 4, p. 383-398.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
